Members briefing
An exclusive e-newsletter for members of the AMA in Tasmania
Make sure you check out the www.amatas.com.au website regularly!
Merry Christmas from all at the AMA
Its been a frantically busy year for the AMA in Tasmania but we have ended it on a high note with the new Industrial Agreement being settled before Christmas, a real lift in the profile of the AMA on many issues, a reinvigorated Southern Division, a healthy rise in membership levels and a clear financial position.
The Branch Council, along with the President Chris Middleton have worked hard on the professionalism within the administration and leadership within the community and the AMA has had a real lift and made an impact as a result.
We wish all the members a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year and we look forward to working hard for you and all Tasmanians in 2010.
Renewal Campaign Underway
Members will have received their renewal documentation in the mail over the past few days. We are encouraging members to take the salary deduction or direct debit options and if paying the full amout the to do so early as the date where services and the right to vote is cut off comes around very quickly.
If anyone has a query please feel free to ring the office and talk to Tony Steven the CEO on 6223 2047.
Joint statement on Collaborative Care
Three of Australia’s peak medical groups today called on the Senate Community Affairs Committee that is inquiring into the Health Legislation Amendment (Midwives and Nurse Practitioners) Bill 2009 and two related Bills to support the Government’s amendments to the Bill.
The Australian Medical Association, Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists and the Royal Australian College of General Practitioners support Government amendments that will require midwives and nurse practitioners to work in formal collaborative arrangements with medical practitioners.
They said that collaborative care was essential for the quality, safety and continuity of patient care.
Patients enjoy better heath outcomes when they are treated in a model of care that provides coordinated, continuous and comprehensive patient-centred care delivered by appropriately trained healthy professionals.
It is imperative that collaborative care arrangements are put in place between health professionals who are involved in patient care and in a position to consider the clinical needs of a patient.
Doctors have been working effectively with other health care professionals for generations. The Government’s amendments to the legislation currently before Parliament clearly support this approach and are sufficiently flexible to allow different team-based models to be developed, based on local circumstances and the clinical needs of patients.
This approach is entirely consistent with the recommendations of the National Health and Hospitals Reform Commission, the Primary Health care Reform report, the Report of the Maternity Services Review and the Government’s stated intention to expand choice and access to services provided by nurse practitioners and midwives working collaboratively with doctors.
The cooperative participation by the medical profession in such collaborative care arrangements is based on what will be in the best interests of patients, consistent with the ethical framework that doctors have always worked under.
It is unhelpful to suggest (as some lobby groups have) that midwives, nurse practitioners and doctors will be competing with each other under collaborative care arrangements. If this notion is accepted by midwives, nurse practitioners and doctors, true clinical collaboration will never be possible.
We therefore strongly caution against the adoption of a presumption of competition rather than clinical collaboration.
In the absence of meaningful collaboration, there are a number of inherent risks to patient care, including:
- fragmentation of patient care by excluding or limiting General Practitioners and other medical specialists from the coordination and/or delivery of patient care,
- increased risk of misdiagnosis and missed diagnosis,
- increased risk of adverse outcomes from the interaction of different medications and treatments prescribed by different health professionals,
- increased cost to the health system because of extra tests being ordered and inappropriate referrals,
- unplanned medical intervention being required at the last minute when things go wrong, and
- communication between health professionals breaking down and professional silos worsening.
